Jealousy...unfaithfulness and how we react to it. I sit and i ponder this, closing my eyes to look into the past and find the answers.
If one is cheated upon, why is one's first instict to be angry at the third party, not the cheater themselves? In a woman's place in a primitive human lifeform, the goal is to stay in favor with the male, to have better all around treatment and the opportunity for bearing young. Thus, all competition must be eliminated. The third party poses a threat to dominance, anger thus being directed first at her, the competition for life.
The man is angered at the rival male for more obvious reasons-they are a rival. They pose a threat to territorial rule if they win over the female's favor.
It is amazing how many human behaviors can be explained by putting them in a primitive setting. Women with broad child-bearing hips and ample breasts have always been recognized as desireable. It a primitive setting, she could bear many offspring and feed them also. Thus in this society, these traits are taken and magnified to being out of proportion. Such emancipated females would been seen as undesirable, unfit to bear heirs.
~To be finished later~













Comments
but yes i love contemplating human nature, by it all adds up to the fact we're massively innefficient, unnessecary beasts of burden on earth who disobey the natural instinct of self preservation and the preservation of our own race.
in other words, humans may be smart, but we're horrible things, no matter how much we gussy ourselves up with societal standards and the likes.
--
"Babel d'escaliers et d'arcades, c'etait un palais infini."
"Nothing is incredulous, but instead is nigh on fundamentality."
*Disregard all above text as heresay, as it is inadmissable in a court of law.*
Wait, how did we go from men liking voluptuous, busty, curvy women to malnourished, unhealthily thin, flat-chested women??? You know exactly what I'm talking about and who...but, anyway, it's not fair! Just a side thought...
--
No, in fact, I do not want your belief system shoved down my throat.
Yes, I do think I know more than you, and I am probably right.
Assassin Rule #1: There are bad assassinations, but no good ones. There are only accidents.
--
No, in fact, I do not want your belief system shoved down my throat.
Yes, I do think I know more than you, and I am probably right.
Assassin Rule #1: There are bad assassinations, but no good ones. There are only accidents.
--
No, in fact, I do not want your belief system shoved down my throat.
Yes, I do think I know more than you, and I am probably right.
Assassin Rule #1: There are bad assassinations, but no good ones. There are only accidents.
and normal species, if removed from the ecosystem throw off the balance, potentially meaning the destruction of ais ecosysytem, but if WE were removed, things could only get better. we contribute nothing to our environment, but take very much.
--
"Babel d'escaliers et d'arcades, c'etait un palais infini."
"Nothing is incredulous, but instead is nigh on fundamentality."
*Disregard all above text as heresay, as it is inadmissable in a court of law.*
we've volved to a point of... GASP! deevolution!
--
"Babel d'escaliers et d'arcades, c'etait un palais infini."
"Nothing is incredulous, but instead is nigh on fundamentality."
*Disregard all above text as heresay, as it is inadmissable in a court of law.*
Previous Page123Next Page